Appeals court majority appears sympathetic to White House ballroom challenge
A majority on a three-judge appeals court panel appeared sympathetic to a challenge to President Trump’s White House ballroom project at oral arguments Friday. The two Democratic-appointed judges pressed the government on its arguments that Congress has already given all necessary approvals and that a preservationist group has no right to sue. “If the government decided very quickly and bulldozed the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors, that was the first…
A majority on a three-judge appeals court panel appeared sympathetic to a challenge to President Trump’s White House ballroom project at oral arguments Friday. The two Democratic-appointed judges pressed the government on its arguments that Congress has already given all necessary approvals and that a preservationist group has no right to sue. “If the government decided very quickly and bulldozed the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors, that was the…
A majority on a three-judge appeals court panel appeared sympathetic to a challenge to President Trump’s White House ballroom project at oral arguments Friday. The two Democratic-appointed judges pressed the government on its arguments that Congress has already given all necessary approvals and that a preservationist group has no right to sue. “If the government decided very quickly and bulldozed the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors, that was the first…
The full story continues on The Hill.
Story Sentry shows a short summary aggregated via RSS. The complete article — original photography, charts, and reporting — lives with the publisher.